Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Chauffer Suspect in Murder of Taiwanese Mogul Shih Chia-chin

Hsieh Yuan-hsin is the primary suspect in the kidnapping and murder of Shih Chia-chin. (Image: Taiwan police)

Taiwanese online gambling ringleader Shih Chia-chin may not be a household name in the net community that is betting but he had been infamous in his home country for the wealth he received by running his web sites. Now, his kidnapping and murder have actually surprised the island country. Shih’s human body was found Sunday evening in Tainan County by police. He was allegedly murdered after being kidnapped by his chauffeur and several others on August 18.

Chauffeur Abducted Shih at Airport

On that day, Shih was picked up at the airport that is taoyuan Taiwan by his chauffeur, Hsieh Yuan-hsin. Just three hours later, the accountant at Shih’s business received a phone call saying that Shih had been kidnapped and demanding a ransom of TW$50 million ($1.67 million). Shih’s family attempted to negotiate with the kidnappers, eventually agreeing to wire TW$30 million ($1 million) to three separate bank accounts.

When the family nevertheless did not hear from Shih, they contacted the authorities for assistance later that day. Hsieh apparently made a make an effort to withdraw the transferred ransom quickly thereafter, but fled when he was asked to provide identification at the bank.

Hsieh Flees to Thailand

Despite efforts from prosecutors whom issued a warrant to bar him from leaving the nation, Hsieh managed to board a flight to Thailand just hours later utilizing a passport that is fake used his photo but his cousin’s name and details. Hsieh was spotted on airport CCTV footage on August 18.

In line with the United Daily Information, police noted that Hsieh didn’t have criminal record, which made them suspect that another person may have planned the kidnapping. He did, however, appear to be covering their tracks, as he had used his passport that is real to a trip to Hong Kong. The passport that is fake been annulled, and Hsieh is suspected to be in Thailand. Nevertheless, authorities fear he could flee to Cambodia or Myanmar, and Thai police have been asked to assist within the investigation.

They also suggested that ransom may possibly not have been the motivation that is primary the crime. Hsieh fled the nation without recovering the ransom, and a watch that is valuable still on Shih’s body with regards to was discovered.

In accordance with a report from the Central News Agency (CNA), a human anatomy was present in an area that is mountainous of County with over 20 puncture wounds towards the back in the evening of August 24, about a week after the kidnapping took place. Shih’s family was called in to spot the physical human body, and confirmed that it was him.

Two Other Suspects in Custody

While Hsieh has not yet been apprehended, two other suspects were arrested on Monday. Full names are not available, but The China Post said that their surnames were Lin and Cheng. According to authorities, Lin confessed to being fully a part of the kidnapping plot, but claimed that he did not know such a thing about plans to murder Shih. The two accomplices were identified utilizing surveillance footage, which revealed they had abandoned Shih’s car in Greater Tainan.

Nine years ago, authorities cracked down on Shih’s Internet gambling ring. That resulted in an 18-month suspended prison term for the man whose fortune had been apparently worth billions of brand New Taiwan Dollars. Reports say that Shih had recently been the victim of a kidnapping attempt four years early in the day.

PokerStars Should Wait to Enter US Markets, Says 888 CEO

888 CEO Brian Mattingley believes PokerStars must certanly be allowed back in the United States, but should face a quick period that is exclusionary. (Image:

PokerStars and 888 Poker are natural competitors, as the companies are a couple of associated with biggest players in today’s online poker industry. PokerStars is by far the absolute most well-known Web poker site on the planet these days, which may be why 888 CEO Brian Mattingley has formerly stated that letting the Amaya-owned poker brand straight back into the US would help all companies, by attracting more players for everyone to share. But now, Mattingley has began walking back those comments a bit, at the very least in terms of allowing PokerStars free entry into lucrative American states.

According to an interview between Mattingley and Bluff Magazine‘s Steve Ruddock, the 888 CEO still thinks that PokerStars will be best for the overall American poker economy, and claims he welcomes their return. However, he does think that they gained an unfair advantage by continuing to solution players into the US after the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) went into effect, and that as a outcome, they need to get at the least a slap on the wrist before they’re let back in.

Statement Appears to Contradict Earlier Stance

June this is a little different from comments published by the Las Vegas Review-Journal (LVRJ) is. In an interview with that paper’s Howard Stutz, Mattingley ended up being quoted as stating that he desired to back see pokerStars come to the United States just as possible.

‘It will be like unleashing a gorilla that is 800-pound the market, but having more players for a regulated site would benefit everyone,’ he said.

‘ We compete with PokerStars throughout Europe,’ Mattingley said of his rival that is largest. ‘They are a definite competitor that is formidable. But they would make all of us work much harder also it would expand the market. I’d much go for a small slice of a large pie, compared to a big piece of a tiny pie.’

Those comments differed with people he made last thirty days to Global Gaming company. There, he said he had been still against ‘bad star’ clauses that would ban PokerStars from industry entirely, but said that some penalties were appropriate.

‘ We ought to see the regulators saying because they were taking wagers illegally for those years, you are going to have to suffer a penalty where you can’t operate for a given period of time,’ Mattingley said that they can come in, but. ‘we think 2 yrs would make some sense…as competitors, I think we have to be permitted to establish our brands, which could be done in two years.’

No Change in Opinion, Claims Mattingley

Those statements that are seemingly incompatible to are clarified into the Bluff interview. He said to Stutz was not included in the LVRJ article in it, Mattingley said that his position has been consistent all along, but that some of what.

According to Mattingley, their statements welcoming PokerStars back in to the US markets were accompanied by a qualifier that is big in which he said ‘…however, I really do believe they got that leading edge operating in an industry where everyone else had been out.’

‘They shouldn’t be allowed to walk into new states,’ Mattingley told Bluff. He offered up that the exclusion of 1 to two years would be appropriate and reasonable to all parties, after which PokerStars should be allowed to compete like someone else.

Packer’s Crown Buys 36-Year Licensing Deal for $847 million

Pleased as punch: James Packer has secured a 36-year license for the Crown Casino in Melbourne, plus tax concessions on high rollers. (Image: Justin Benson-Cooper/

James Packer’s Crown Casino in Melbourne received a license extension until 2050 through the federal Government of the Australian state of Victoria, which has defended its decision to allow for the multi-decade add-on. The Victoria national will additionally allow Packer to expand table games and ‘pokie’ (slot) machines in Crown casinos, in return for re payments of up to A$910 million (US$847 million).

Politicians and anti-gambling groups have called the deal ‘grubby’ and ‘back-door,’ and declare that does not have transparency. But Victoria’s treasurer, Michael O’Brien, said that the contract would support investment that is economic jobs.

‘This agreement provides significant benefits that are financial’ he said, ‘as well as improved competitiveness and investment certainty for Crown and the 8,800 people who work here.’

Crown casino chairman Packer had been also fast to highlight the sensed economic benefits. He said that, while his business had invested $1.7 billion to update the casino, ‘it had for the time that is long at ‘a major competitive disadvantage on the problem of taxation.

‘Now,’ he added, ‘with the support of the government that is victorian we will have a license that enables us to compete for a level playing field to help drive tourism, jobs and economic benefit for the state.’

Anti-Gambling Backlash

Australian Churches Gambling Taskforce Chairman Rev. Tim Costello ended up being one of the main who spoke out up against the deal, but.

‘ This thing that is whole,’ he said. ‘This close to an election, why would you do a deal without transparency, and with such haste, whenever it has major implications for the Victorian public? Australia has 20 % of all of the earth’s pokies, it has the biggest population of issue gamblers in the world, yet it has gone through without the debate or discussion.’

Five future governments, he added, would be bound to the deal. ‘I think people now has a world-weary cynicism about politicians, and so they know massive political donations get to government from the gambling industry. They want fewer pokies, perhaps not an increase or maintenance of current levels.’

Crown said it would expand the number of pokie machines and video gaming tables beneath the new deal, however the number of pokie device licenses would stay the exact same, because it will be absorbing existing licenses from pubs and clubs. Year additionally, the Victoria government also agreed that a ‘super-tax’ will also be removed on all high-rolling VIP players from next.

Concessions to your Crown

This point that is last said O’ Brien, will allow Crown to compete with casinos in Macau and Singapore.

‘ This is a very competitive industry. We want to guarantee that high rollers from overseas find an explanation to desire to come to Melbourne to invest their money,’ the treasurer noted.

However, Deakin University gambling expert and researcher Professor Linda Hancock questioned the logic behind this.

‘ I see no reason why the government should be providing any concessions to Crown, it’s quite outrageous really,’ she said. ‘Crown has been methodically under-taxed for years. These sorts of concessions and deals must certanly be part of an election platform and shouldn’t have already been brokered in today’s world, but that is a characteristic of gambling policy. The government is really beholden to your gambling industry, which is offering them this candy to fill government coffers for their election campaign.’

The deal significantly fortifies the position of Crown Resorts and this was reflected in the stock market despite negative publicity. Stocks in the company rose in the hours after the story originally broke.

Deixe uma resposta

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *